The Bloodless Revolution

 

Today, and we must admit it, even if our managers and owners of these media worldwide, may turn out to be on the wrong side of society, but, in reality, are they? Indeed, thanks to these media – Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, Web, Wikipedia, etc. -, thanks to them, the People of the whole world, the one who has been kept in chains and in cultural darkness for millennia, the one to whom education has not been and is still not at hand today, thanks to Facebook, Twitter, etc. , is becoming aware of how the pyramidal society in which we live of “homo species” is really built on this rock that turns and turns around the sun. THIS IS A REVOLUTION WITHOUT BLOOD SHEDDING, THE FRST OF ITS KIND IN THE ENTIRE WORLD.

We can say that from the Slave Revolution, which began with Spartacus, to that of the Magna Carta in England 1215, and ending with the Cuban one, none of them, except that of the Magna Carta, perhaps, none of them did not shed seas of blood, and what obtained? Those who wore the chains still wear them today. And not only. THE REVOLUTION WITHOUT THE SPILLING OF BLOOD is also instructive, educational, cultural, human on a world level, never before has the People, without which nothing is born, grows or flourishes, had a Revolution of this kind.

(more…)

My chat in Singapore

 

In this chat, has man a sense in the world in which he lives?, I will talk about cosmic reality, cosmic reality as it is and not how we want it to be. Forgive me if I insist in these two ways of seeing the world: one objective and one subjective. I divide the world into real and not real. Particles, atoms, molecules, all physical things are real; ideas, theories, concepts, are unreal in the sense that they are not physical, they exist thanks to the physical world. This last one is totally independent from the human world. Sure, we can have a brief, a very brief influence on it, a local influence, of course, this yes, but, in the long run, the world will be always the old world. Life and harmony are a temporary phenomenon in our universe; chaos and disasters, instead, are its real stabilized nature: entropy and the second law of thermodynamics require it.

Next post: first image of the universe (already published)

 

From a metaphysical universe to a physical one

 

 

“Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal ‘Annalen der Physik’ , where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world”.

 

All scientists

They always start in their workies

From an existing universe

But have they ever wondered

What was there before this

Existing universe?

The universe didn’t start with the big bang

So?

 

From the moment we start talking about a phenomenal universe, contemporarily we leave behind us the metaphysical one. But, then, do we really leave it behind us?

Classical physics, or the physics of the infinitely large and quantum physics, or the physics of the infinitely small, come, at a certain stage, into play with one another. From this contact large-small the phenomenal universe was born. But, what was there before them?

Nothingness of nothingness.

And before nothingness of nothingness?

Nothingness.

If we try to explain the universe in this way, it makes sense, so do we, and all becomes simple and clear. Otherwise, all is absurd, including ourselves!

Here is for you the Universe without tricks, simple to understand and with a few words!

Furthermore, I would like to add, that to the “Theory of Everything”, I’ll oppose the “Knowledge of Everything” which, in my opinion, makes sense, while the other one is only abstract nonsense.

 

How to be cured from religion

 

I read the Bible, almost from top to bottom, in French, English and Italian. When I read it in English, I was in Australia, in Melbourne, and I remember very well that I found the reading full of things that I didn’t find them mentally digestible, reasonable, human. Anyone who has read this book, perhaps understands me. In short, its reading is absurd when compared with real life.

In other words: Can we believe that a few millennia ago God created the world from nothing and in 7 days? Can we believe that the kangaroos were in Noah’s Ark and then swam to Australia? Can we believe, after seeing it from the sky, that the Earth is flat? I must continue? Thank you.

One time, instinctively and with all my strength, I threw the Bible I was reading against the window of my flat and broke the glass. Why read it, you may say, if you found it illegible? Because I wanted to understand, before having my own opinions on a book written by God himself!, and so at times I forced myself to read other books, not that I liked them, but because I wanted to know their content personally and to know it, I had first to read them.

(more…)

“I, Francis Sgambelluri, declare myself to be the DISCOVERER of the true beginning of the Universe” article pagiarized

 

Ho l’impressione che tra ieri e oggi  questo mio articolo è stato plagiato si Facebook.

Vorrei chiedere, dato che l’ho pubblicato sul sito “ASTONOMY KNOWLEDGE” se ne sanno qualcosa.

Ho avuto un breve contatto per iscritto con “Filip Nemeri Astronomy Knowledge” e il suo comportamento mi ha sorpreso molto in negativo.

Il mio lavoro è conosciuto su Facebook, Twitter, Linkdin e non parliamo poi di libri e areticoli ecc. e “I, Francis Sgambelluri, declare myself to be the DISCOVERER of the true beginning of the Universe”, è un lavoro originalissimo che porta, passo dopo passo, all’origine dell’universo.  

Comunque alla fine del mio articolo c’è scritto: “Having said that, if you found the article interesting, spread the word, send it to whoever you want, even to magazines and newspapers, obviously “leaving my name and my copyright”, thank you!” Quindi this copyright COPYRIGHT hope it’s enough to protect my work, di protegere il mio lavoro dai pagliatori, dai ladri delle opere altrui.

In “Bad Astronomy sotto, che io ho trovato su Internet, Google, c’è il nome di Filip Nemeri

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from …https://www.amazon.it › Bad-Astronomy-Misconceptio…

Philip Plait clears up every misconception on astronomy and space you never … Though some may find him strident, Plait succeeds brilliantly because his …

Hai visitato questa pagina in data 20/05/22

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses … – Amazon.ithttps://www.amazon.it › B0014ESXVY

“Bad Astronomy is just plain good! Philip Plait clears up every misconception on astronomy and space you never knew you suffered from.

Sono stato invitato e onorato anche dalla Oxford University to tallk about my work…

Thank you, now you know readers “My ideas are my ideas” and the thieves, those who plagiarize the work of others should be treated by the law as such!

Sorry for the confusion, I am a little too much worried and angry that certain people could rob others …

 

Francis Sgambellury

Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill in the Mirror

 

“Germany should be bombed regularly

every 50 years even for no reason “.

Cit. Sir Winston Churchill

 

It’s time to make some comparisons between these two historical figures: Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill. I will be very brief and I hope not to say stupid things, I who am not a historian.

Art and politics, Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill, had them in their blood and more precisely, the first, Adolf Hitler, had them in his heart; the second, Winston Churchill, had them in his brain. Of the first it is said that he was a monster, with a heart I would add; of the second it is said that he was a great man, with the brain I would add. Let’s start with the latter.

Sir Winston Churchill, thanks to his brain, he would have sent 400,000 soldiers, mostly British, to the slaughterhouse on the beach of Dunkirk if it would have been up to him, and perhaps the Second World War could have ended there; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, didn’t bomb those 400,000 thousand soldiers stranded in Dunkirk either from the air or from the ground; Sir Winston Churchill, thanks to his brain, in the Operation Catapult 1940, shot French ships, his allies, for fear that the Germans could seize them and then use the ships against the British; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, spared Paris and its monuments despite the negative behavior of the French against the Germans, particularly in the Versailles negotiations at the end of the First World War; Sir Winston Churchill, thanks to his brain, in 1940 many Londoners wanted peace, he wanted war and he got it; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, delayed his attack on Russia for three months (and it was fatal for him and Germany, some experts said, due to the change of season) to go to help the poor Italian soldiers who ended up under the fire of the Greeks; Sir Winston Churchill, while the war raged in the desert of El Alamein, he painted quietly and happily in a palace in Marrakech; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, had begun to understand at a certain moment of the war that his generals no longer obeyed him; Sir Winston Churchill, thanks to his brain, at the end of the Second World War, when Germany was now just a pile of debris, had Dresden and other German cities that still breathed razed to the ground; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, in the last days of his life married his partner, Eva Braun, and then committed suicide together with his wife in order not to end, both he and she, neither alive nor dead in the hands of the enemy.

(more…)

I, Francis Sgambelluri, declare myself to be the DISCOVERER of the true beginning of the Universe

 

“Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal ‘Annalen der Physik’ , where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world”.

 

All scientists

They always start in their workies

From the existing universe

But have they ever wondered

What was there before this

Existing universe?

The universe didn’t start with the big bang

So?

 

Before arriving at the nothingness of nothingness, or at the beginning of the universe, I made a long journey and, once I arrived at my destination, I realized that I ended up where there is nothing of nothing. The nothingness of nothingness reigns everywhere. Before me there is only infinity and above my head the universe that I have just left behind. A unique and unwelcoming view surrounds me. I decide to take a dip in the immense. I have no sense of time. I travel with the mind and when you travel with the mind you can go around the Big Whole in the blink of an eye. The speed of the mind, and one can be a master of this art only and only if one has a real or imaginative knowledge of it, the speed of the mind, however, compared to that of the light is much slower than that of an old tortoise. In any case, at one point I turn around as I swoop down and, amazed, I notice that the universe in which I had traveled was reduced to a mammoth ball. At this point I thought I was going to see other bloated balls, but the void of nothingness was now in every point around me, just a 360 degrees open space and the big ball that was getting smaller and smaller and nothing else. There was no more reason for me to go further from where I was. And then to find what? I returned to my ball, to my universe and resumed the journey towards the Milky Way, towards home.

I was born the 11 February 1942 in an old house in Pantaleo, under a mountain called Timpa in dialect. When I left this place, around 15 years, I spoke only the Pantaleo dialect, I imitated the sounds of animals and that of natural phenomena – thunder, rain, wind, etc. Since that farewell to my family, my Timpa and my animals, my life has been nothing more than a single battle in order to be able to study.

(more…)

I invited to the UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD ?

 

Mr. Priestly Williams writes on Facebook after reading my “The cosmic foundations and the discovery that God is = to Nothingness of Nothingness” and some other titles of my books that I have published:“The Trilogy”, namely “Flash about man and the universe”, “From nothingness of nothingness to virtual immortality”, and “Son of the elements and the big bang, the cosmic autobiography of a human being”, plus “The 4 pillars that support the universe and the before and the afterlife of the Big Bang”, published by Contro Corrente (Print MnM Edizions), plus the article I published on my blog: “Einstein, a pillar of modern physics made of papier mache or my Singapore speech”.

Here are his words:

“Are you over burdened by assignments? We can help you out. We have highly qualified and experienced expert in each field. Our fee is pocket friendly. We offer discounts to our clients with many orders. Kindly message us in case you need help. Thank you.

My reply:

Thank you so much Sir. I am very pleased and honored by your invitation to talk about my work in the prestigious University of Oxford. No Italian university has ever invited me or just considered my work. *

Still many thanks and greetings.

 

Francis Sgambelluri

 

 

*   P. S.    I don’t exclude the fact that to present my work, the University of Oxford would ask me for a fee. Anyhow, I’m sure that Mr. Priestly Williams will give me more details about it.

The cosmic foundations and the discovery that God is = Nothingness of Nothingness

 

 

“Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal ‘Annalen der Physik’ , where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world”.

 

I don’t understand why I didn’t grasp it before. Yet it was easy to imagine. God represents Nothingness of Nothingness, that is what we don’t know and never will. It is something that could be as big as the head of a pin or big as the whole space. In all its vastness or microscopic nature there isn’t a single billionth of a billionth of space different from all the rest. Everything is the same. This is the primordial space and also the house of Nothingness of Nothingness.

It took me 80 years to figure it out. God = to Nothingness of Nothingness. No one, since this story began, has ever discovered a single real phenomenon in it: just as in Nothingness of Nothingness, with the difference the last one is a real empty phenomenon and God only an invented concept. Of course, it can’t be excluded. We can, indeed, we must conceive that the first particle appeared by chance, spontaneuosly from Nothingness of Nothingness, that is from an infinite void. We can also imagine that the primordial particle has, over billions and billions of years of evolution, doubled so many times itself to create a physical mass huge enough to detonate the big bang and, therefore, create the universe we know today. This intuition, if true, would lead our big bang, from its current position, to the true beginning of the universe billions and billions of years before.

(more…)

A Revolution with the capital R

 

Today, and we must admit it, even if the managers and masters of these means of communication worldwide, may turn out to be on the wrong social side, but in fact, are they? Indeed, thanks to these media – Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, Web, Wikipedia, etc. – thanks to them, the people of the whole world, the one for whom education is not always at hand, are becoming aware of how physically and politically this rock that turns and turns around the Sun is really made and ruled. Conscious or unconscious, it is a real Revolution without bloodshed. And not only. It is also instructive, educational, cultural and a human revolution, never done it before. Such a Revolution (with a capital R) on a planetary level could bring about social changes that we don’t realize it yet.

I have taught in different countries and in my classrooms there were sometimes 20 students and sometimes more and others less, but today when I publish an article on Facebook, Twitter, etc., it could be seen and read by thousands of people. A big difference, isn’t it? Thanks to all those who deserve them!

My realism: we live in the worst of all possible worlds

 

This is my thesis, the thesis supported by my 80 years dedicated to understanding man and the universe. For me, in fact, the universe in which we live, starting from its smallest particle that appeared by chance up to its largest galactic mass, is a unique and insurmountable irrationality. No god, no scientist, no philosopher, metaphysician, astronomer, man could never, despite of all his talents, science and creativity, never would be able to create a world more worse, hellish and meaningless than ours: a unique and insurmountable monstrosity.

Let us not be influenced by the fragrance of the roses, flowers, the beautiful landscapes, the first love, because these dazzles one day, if we wake up from the natural sleep, we then discover that they were nothing else than the prelude to a nightmare to come.

The Earth we live on, together with the solar system, are nothing more than a fabric of endless catastrophe. Plants, species, herbivores and carnivores, including homo sapiens sapiens, from birth to death know nothing more than a battle fought day by day and only to stay temporarily alive, just the time to discover that they are living in the worst of all possible worlds.

(more…)

The transparent universe

 

A cosmic awareness

gives us a healthy and full idea

how the universe is concretely made

and not as we want it to be”!

 

With this post, friends of Facebook, of Twitter and of the Web, I will give you the whole universe and forever. Do you think, maybe, that I’m crazy telling you this? At all! Read this article first and then decide if I am crazy or you, perhaps, a bit surprised by this argument!

Let’s begin:

This post could make some chattering, not noises created by numbers, equations, particles, quants, none of this stuff, but real chattering or, if you want, noises of species, of planets, of the solar system, of galaxies and, finally, cosmic noises, noises never heard before and much less will be heard in the future, they are, putting all of them together, a unique murmuring universal sound in the background.

Our universe, finally!, has become transparent, all crystal clear, there are no more mysteries about it, a single and universal mirror. In fact, once we know that our universe has a metaphysical background, that it has a beginning and an end, and from its first particle to the last of which it is composed, scientifically speaking, is pure irrationality. In short, once we have taken consciously a realistic picture of our universe, then we can say that we understand who we are and the world and the universe in which we live.

(more…)

The Four Pillars Which Hold up the Cosmic Edifice *

The four pillars which hold up the cosmic edifice are nothingness of nothingness, the proto-element, space and time.

The human species

Since we humans became a thinking species, we have sought to understand who created us, where we come from, who created the world, who lived in the sky, where we went after we died, etc. etc. In this respect, over the millennia of history, the human species has invented masses and masses of fairy tales, of stories, of mythologies about gods and other fanciful beings which I don’t want to list here. That is not the purpose of this article. Here I would like to propose to you the origins of the universe. The rest should be easy to understand.

 

The universe, as we know it today, is supported by four fundamental pillars, i.e., on nothingness of nothingness, on the proto-element, on space and on time.

(more…)

Frank Ferreri’s existential testament

 

“Death will come

And it will have your eyes”, Pavese says

“Not mine, I say

Because I’ll have them before her.”

 

In the meantime, I would like to say that, despite all the adversities I had to face in life, I have achieved what I wanted to achieve: to understand my fellow men, the universe and the world in which I was born and lived. In my way I understood them.

Sure, I could have committed suicide without saying a word, as most suicides do. Instead, I do the opposite, I write the reasons that led me to this act and I say that for me suicide was one of the most convenient things of my life: I could get rid of it when and how I wanted.

My death, therefore. In fact, I had already decided on this act towards the end of the Sixties, in Paris. Then it didn’t happen. Then, the “then” of this time, became the then of today and between these two “thens” passed more than 50 years. I reasoned like this in those past times and I still think like this:

Being born from nothing and then returning to another nothing without a “but” and without a “why”, is not fun for a mind that thinks and from any point of view one sees it.

(more…)

What are really the universities?

 

In two words: factories of the mind. Let’s look at them a little close. Meanwhile, when I write saying that the universities are factories of the mind, I mean factories of the State, of the Church, of the Capitalism, of Military Academies, of Science in general, etc., this confirms their servile function towards their masters. Furthermore, I don’t say this because I want to offend them, much less insult university students, graduates or because I am envious since I am not a graduate. At all. This thought has never even crossed my mind, especially since I don’t see graduates and non-graduates around, I only see human beings. When I write saying that universities are factories of the mind at the service of the Powerful Men, I write it because in reality they are so. Nobody is born with a degree or a specialization. Anyone who has a brain knows this, understands it. He/she doesn’t say it because certain things are not said, but this is the reality, a somewhat uncomfortable reality according to certain customs, but we have enough of falsehood and nonsense in this discriminatory and absurd world and we certainly don’t intend to make it even more unlivable.

(more…)

Who are the real young and who are the real old

 

It’s true, “the years pass quickly”, but the youth, paradoxically, can remain because it depends, not on the years, but on our brain. Old age, in reality, has nothing to do with age; old age, as we understand it, doesn’t exist. Life, understood in a natural way, is a single cycle, it starts from birth and ends with death. This is not how the mental, cultural, historical and philosophical age works. A 25 year young man and an 80 year old man may be older, culturally speaking, the young man and not the 80 year old man. Old age is not in the body, but in the head. We are culture not flesh. One is born flesh, but becomes culture. Old age weighs itself with intelligence. Be clever and you’ll stay young even when you are 100 years old; be young but an idiot and you are already old!

But I, Francis Sgambelluri, who am I realistically?

 

I have spoken in these days about my autobiography. Now I would like to talk about my life by giving you a self-definition of its concreteness and physical evolution.

To begin with, I am an animal that represents the inanimate and the animated world in miniature.

What does it mean “world” for you ?, someone asks me.

I answer.

World for me means something that is formed by a set of atoms grouped in a small space of the universe that make up the inanimate and the animated phenomena that inhabit it and last as long as they can and then disappear.

From where come from these atoms?

(more…)

The Universe as it is in 12 images

 

Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal “Annalen der Physik” where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world.

The only tolerable immortality is the virtual one and he who knows the universe  will conquest it. That’s what I propose in this post to the readers of the Web.

 

In these 12 images of the universe, starting with homo sapiens sapiens and ending with the immortal virtuality, each of us should be able to understand his own casualty and the meaning of his life in this  world of ours. I would like to start by saying that quantum mechanics and general relativity * represent the micro and the macro. In other words, the former belongs to the micro-world, the latter to the macro-world; the first appeared from nothingness of nothingness, the second emerged from the phenomena (i. e. the force of attraction is relative to the magnitude of each phenomenon in question); the first imposes a metaphysical question, the second a physical one; the first has to do with chance, the second with the end: big crunch or big chill; the second without the first wouldn’t exist, the first without nothingness of nothingness either. All this is logical as 2 + 2 = 4, and this helps us nearly to touch with our own hands the origins of the universe, but it doesn’t help us to make sense of our lives, this no or maybe yes? We’ll see.

Let’s start with the first image. Personally, of all the species on this planet, the one that most terrifies and amazes me, is the homo sapiens sapiens.

(more…)

The existence of the “Universe” and “Life”

 

 

Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal “Annalen der Physik” where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world.

 

In what follows in this article, I will try to sketch the true basis of the universe and life. Don’t misunderstand me. I’m not a madman and much less one who goes on looking for awards, I am one who is interested to know the heart and soul of the reality that has created us and the world and this is what I will try to illustrate in the seven main definitions on the origin and evolution of the universe.

Let’s start with the first definition. At the beginning there was only “nothingness of nothingness”. At that time only this existed. You can see it as big as the point of a needle or immense as much as you manage to imagine it. There was nothing else, not even the tip of a pin. We call this place of nothingness of nothingness, the primordial basis of the universe.

The second definition. It was from nothingness of nothingness that was created spontaneously “the first particle”. This particle, after billions and billions of years, gave birth to the universe we know today. This is its origin and its birth and also the second basis of the universe. Of course, we could write an entire encyclopedia regarding this start, but we wouldn’t advance of a single comma for what concerns this initial moment.

(more…)

The World-Universe * in a few clear and meaningful words

Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal “Annalen der Physik” where only a few scientists and with many difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on my blog, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their reality, simplicity and meaning, can read and understand them in the whole world.

 

“And what about the content between Einstein’s articles and yours?”, a reader asked me once.

 

“It depends on our point of view,” I replied. The same could be said for the post you’re going to read now.

 

Our world-universe moves in the middle of an infinite space. Before it, there was nothingness of nothingness,

that is to say nothing, total zero, not even a particle. The “nothing” as science understands it, doesn’t exist. For science, “nothing” is full of particles. So if “nothing” is full of particles, it can’t be nothing. In nothingness of nothingness there are not even the particles.

(more…)

To the lords of the Nobel Committee of Stockholm

 

Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal “Annalen der Physik” where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world.

 

You might think I’m crazy, but I’m not crazy, crazy is who thinks I’m crazy, not to say an imbecile. Here are some of my Nobel discoveries:

1          “Nothingness of the nothingness”  or the basis of the universe, that is, a universe born by chance from nothingness of nothingness. This is the essence and the reality of the universe.

2          “The proto-element” or the beginning or the mother particle of the universe, that is, the particle that contains within itself all the elements to create the universe we know today. This is the birth of the universe.

(more…)

To die as a Christian is to die against nature *

 

If the Christian religion were true, I would be the first to embrace it. It is not. It is false. It is unnatural and anti-human.

God doesn’t exist, and all believers and non-believers know it.

Christ is fiction, like Don Quixote and Madame Bovary.

The Madonna is a ridiculous invention.

(more…)

What distinguishes me from Copernicus, Newton, Einstein and Hawking:

 

Things as they are

and not as we want them to be

 

I have something to say about the universe that Mr Copernicus didn’t have,

I have something to say about the universe that Mr Newton didn’t have,

I have something to say about the universe that Mr Einstein didn’t have,

I have something to say about the universe that Mr Hawking didn’t have:

I know the origins, the roots and the base of the universe that they didn’t know.

 

What distinguishes me from these 4 brains is also what follows:

(more…)

Human History in a Nutshell

 

 

For a new vision of humankind and of the universe

 

Greetings and welcome to this short, indeed very short, chat about the history of humankind. I will start by saying that today, on a global level, there is an uneasiness in this society of ours which has now gone beyond any limit or any sense of decency.

(more…)

Scott Fischer and the 10th of May 1996 on the summit of the Everest

 

If Scott Fischer became a great man, he didn’t become so because he was an excellent mountaineer, much less because he was the head of the business Mountain Madness, even less because he was an American and let’s not talk about being a good family man; Scott Fischer has become a great man because the society, despite all its pitfalls, has failed to make out of him a social robot. This is the portrait I made of this personage while I was reading “The Climb: Tragic Ambitions on Everest”, Anatoli Boukreev and G. Weston DeWalt, and this is also the most beautiful thing that could happen to a man.

Me and the Universe

 

A new vision of the cosmos and life

I need

I don’t know about you

but I need

before I am going to die

to have a vision of everything

and my everything is this:

(more…)

The universe as it is and not as we want it to be in 10 images (1)

 

First picture of the universe

 

For all those who love,

not lies told by interested parties

from millennia to millennia

but for all those who love truth and reality.

 

Let’s see, for an instant, all the phenomena that make up the entire universe, not the way we want to see them, but for what they really are: things without names, naked and rudimentary objects in an immense vacuum. This is their reality. Seeing them so, how would they appear to us? They would appear as lifeless matter, blind bodies, bodies big and small, strong and weak, bare and barren, of long and short duration. In short, blind bodies and nothing else.

The universe, when we see it as it is, we realize that it is only a mixture of bodies of all imaginable and unimaginable dimensions, structures, properties, bodies and bodies ourselves. Voilà its reality: a mass of objects, of phenomena, of wonders and nightmares, nothing more, nothing less than a mass of physical elements that roar chaotically in an infinite vacuum, crashing blindly against one another and, in the end, they destroy themselves by losing and disintegrating in the immensity they are in. This is our universe and this is also its ultimate truth and reality.

Someone of you may say: “It’s not true that the universe is only a mass of physical objects and nothing more. It’s enough to take us with our creativity, thoughts, believes, cultures, to demonstrate that what you just said is wrong”.

To this remark I would reply by saying that, if we see this lifeless mass of objects that constitute the whole universe only in the short run, then the remark is correct. Correct, of course, up to a certain point, since all the values we gave to the universe are not its, are ours, we gave them to it. Instead, if we see this mass of objects that constitute the whole universe in the long run, in millions and billions of years, then we realize that we, for this mass of objects constantly in collision with one another, we are for them only momentary dust, pus, itch, disease, rubbish or, if you want, why not, a momentary decoration and nothing else.

In the next post, the second.

 

The universe as it is and not as we want it to be in 10 images

 

I divide the world into real and not real. Particles, atoms, molecules, proteins, phenomena, all physical things are real; ideas, theories, inventions, concepts, are unreal in the sense that they are not physical, they exist thanks to the physical world. This last one istotally independent from the human world.Sure, we can have a brief, a very brief influence on it, a locally influence, of course, this we can, but, in the long run, the world will be always the old world.Life and harmony are a temporary phenomenon in our universe; the contingent, chaos and annihilation, instead, are its real stabilized nature.

And this is not all. The whole universe is a metaphysical concept, a concept that goes beyond the physical world. Its essence is not made of particles, atoms, substance, corporeity; it’s essence is made of nothingness of nothingness. This is what brought the world into the world. So, when we talk about the universe, we have to keep in mind that we are talking of something that goes beyond science, beyond physics, beyond ourselves.

In what follows, I am going to give you 10 brief pictures of the universe, and in these 10 brief pictures, I’ll try to describe it and our position in it as objectively as I can.

In the next post, I’ll start with the first image.

Einstein, a pillar of modern physics made of papier mâché 4*

or

My Singapore’s speech

 

Part four

 In this chat, has man a sense in the world in which he lives?,I will talk about cosmic reality, cosmic reality as it is and not how we want it to be. Forgive me if I insist in these two ways of seeing the world: one objective and one subjective

I divide the world into real and not real. Particles, atoms, molecules, all physical things are real; ideas, theories, concepts, are unreal in the sense that they are not physical, they exist thanks to the physical world. This last one istotally independent from the human world.Sure, we can have a brief, a very brief influence on it, a locally influence, of course, this yes, but, in the long run, the world will be always the old world.Life and harmony are a temporary phenomenon in our universe; chaos, instead, is its real stabilized nature: entropy and the second law of thermodynamics require it.

(more…)

Einstein, a pillar of modern physics made of papier mâché 3*

or

My Singapore’s speech

 

“The nature of the universe is not difficult to understand and to explain. It’s us, with our ignorance and arrogance, that makes it difficult to understand and to explain. We do even our best, one way or another, to make it hard and incomprehensible”.

Orazio Guglielmini

 

By the way, I don’t send this script to the Editorial Board of the “Annalen der Physik”. I send it directly to the common readers of the Web, because I’m sure they don’t need to be scientists or geniuses to understand the meaning of what I write.

 

Part three

We arrived in part three of our chat, that is between nothingness of nothingness and the proto-element.This happening is an achievement for our civilization. Just think that it tookthousands and thousands of years of thought before reaching here, here at the real base of our universe, here where all began.This means that I have to talk to you now about some of the most important theoretical concepts and happenings, and exactly in this order.

(more…)

Einstein, a pillar of modern physics made of papier mâché2 *

or

My Singapore’s speech

 

“For a new vision of the universe and of the meaning of life.”

Orazio Guglielmini

 

Part two

The history of the universe has many endings – big crunch, big rip, big freeze, big bounce, etc., – but not a single beginning. No one dares to go beyond Max Planck’s wall or, more easily said, beyond the Big Bang. Everything started at this moment. But the Big Bang is not the beginning of the universe. Absolutely not. It’s ridiculous just to think that the Big Bang appeared out of nothing. Another kind of stationary universe. When this event happened, between thirteen and fourteen billion years ago, billion plus billion less, the universe was only halfway through its journey.

(more…)

Einstein, a pillar of modern physics made of papier mâché *

Einstein, a pillar of modern physics made of papier mâché *

or

My Singapore’s speech

 

“For a new vision of the universe

and of the meaning of life.”

Orazio Guglielmini

 

Good morning!

I suppose you all know my name, the International Meetings published it in a leaflet. However, my name is Francis Sgambelluri, a free thinker.

The reason why I was invited to come to Singapore was due to the article I sent to the committee of molecular physics towards the end of 2018. The article talked  about Einstein.

I would like to make it clear from the start that I have nothing against him. I just have to correct some of his ideas. That’s all.

(more…)

Welcome to the kingdom of the absurd, * a meditation about life, death and the real nature of the world

 

“The universe as it is

and not for how we want it

to be.”

Orace Guglielmini

 

To begin with, WE DON’T GROW UP TO LIVE, WE GROW UP TO DIE. We are constructed, piece by piece, not for life, but for death. No one escapes this blind verdict. Slaves, prisoners, serfs, from birth to death, of a nightmare we call life. All along our existential torture we are at the mercy of something we never saw or spoke with. Born, therefore, not to live, but to die. Each second, each heart bit, each look, each word, is a second, a heart bit, a look and a word less to live. Life runs towards death, towards the end, the end of the end. The unnamable decided our destiny before we were born.

(more…)

Love is a totally feminine product

 

– So many stories!

– What are you talking about?

– Read it and you’ll see.

 

The innate is a construct

 

This article is not an article against men, as it may appear from its title, it is an article which has to do with our history, our biology, our chemistry, atomicity, and therefore with our true reality. This may not please the machos, or misogynists, phallocrats, anti-feminists amongst us, but, whether they like it or not, it doesn’t change anything, it’s how things are.

Let’s start by saying that the male, of any species, as soon as they have mated with a female, calms down a little, as their physical being demands, but after a while, their search for another female starts up again, their sexual instinct imposes it on them.

(more…)

If this is a man, then I eliminate him

 

If the so-called “human being”, when we go to the heart of the matter, cannot do anything else, but only fill his stomach and kill his fellow men, I of this “human being” don’t know what to do except to eliminate him.

owHow?

I put him in a cannon and then pull the trigger.

(more…)

The love that nourishes and transforms us in human beings

 

 

“Sex is a momentary itch, love never let you go,”

         Kingsley Amis

 

Love, when it comes, let’s enjoy it until it lasts and, when it is finished, we must be grateful to those who we loved and loved us. He, deep down, doesn’t owe us anything; she, deep down, doesn’t owe us anything, and yet, for an hour, for a night, for a month or years, we gave each other so much of our bodies, of our souls, of our spirits, of our hearts, of our physical and spiritual intimacy: in short, of our love. So much, we gave to each other.

(more…)

Sir Winston Churchill, the painter

 

“As long as we do not understand that the worst people in the world are those who govern and have governed it, we have not yet understood anything about ourselves or the world in which we live.”

 Orazio Guglielmini

 

Here is how the great man expresses himself in this painting business:

“I have to say that I love bright colors. When I get to heaven, I intend to spend a considerable part of my first million years painting to get to the essence of the subject. So, I will need a palette even more vivid than the one I have down here. There will be a whole range of new and wonderful colors to delight the celestial eye, “from the DVD History, Winston Churchill, the lion of England.

(more…)

Physics as a spiritual exercise

 

Our brains have three main ways of thinking, at least that’s what anthropologists say: instinctive, rational and meditative. The first is fastest, the second is the most reflective and the third the most contemplative.

To give examples, we could say that the first, instinctive thought, is natural, we cannot steer it, we do not have control over it. If we touch something very hot with our fingers, the immediate reaction is to take our hand away, that is instinctive. This way of acting and reacting in the face of something unexpected is predetermined, it doesn’t depend on us ourselves, and it can be salutary but also fatal, as for example when we freeze in the face of danger.

(more…)

Hubert Reeves’ God

 

Science cannot know whether there is a God or not, so says the Canadian astrophysicist and cosmologist Hubert Reeves. Science is not moral, it doesn’t tell us what is good and what is bad, science tells us only how things are. However, he doesn’t believe that a Mozart or a Beethoven could be created purely by chance. Neither does he believe in an organising principle. His inner conviction is that something exists, but he doesn’t know what. This is how Reeves continues when asked if God exists or not.

(more…)

The reality of believing is that it is impossible to believe

“Whoever is scared of reality shouldn’t read me. I am reality.”

      Orazio Guglielmini

foto (2)Six concepts which demonstrate the lack of foundation in matters of religious belief. What are they? The first is “ignorant”, the second is “egoistic”, the third is “prudent (knowing)”, the fourth is “absolute”, the fifth is “the will to believe” and the sixth is “agnostic”. Even an atheist is a person who believes, but atheism derives from Democrites, Epicure, Lucrezio and an atheist is an atomist, materialist, physicalist and has nothing to do with the above-mentioned believers. And now let’s illustrate these six concepts in chronological order.

(more…)