“Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal ‘Annalen der Physik’ , where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world”.

All scientists

They always start in their workies

From an existing universe

But have they ever wondered

What was there before this

Existing universe?

The universe didn’t start with the big bang

So?

From the moment we start talking about a phenomenal universe, contemporarily we leave behind us the metaphysical one. But, then, do we really leave it behind us?

Classical physics, or the physics of the infinitely large and quantum physics, or the physics of the infinitely small, come, at a certain stage, into play with one another. From this contact large-small the phenomenal universe was born. But, what was there before them?

Nothingness of nothingness.

And before nothingness of nothingness?

Nothingness.

If we try to explain the universe in this way, it makes sense, so do we, and all becomes simple and clear. Otherwise, all is absurd, including ourselves!

Here is for you the Universe without tricks, simple to understand and with a few words!

Furthermore, I would like to add, that to the “Theory of Everything”, I’ll oppose the “Knowledge of Everything” which, in my opinion, makes sense, while the other one is only abstract nonsense.

Ho l’impressione che tra ieri e oggi  questo mio articolo è stato plagiato si Facebook.

Vorrei chiedere, dato che l’ho pubblicato sul sito “ASTONOMY KNOWLEDGE” se ne sanno qualcosa.

Ho avuto un breve contatto per iscritto con “Filip Nemeri Astronomy Knowledge” e il suo comportamento mi ha sorpreso molto in negativo.

Il mio lavoro è conosciuto su Facebook, Twitter, Linkdin e non parliamo poi di libri e areticoli ecc. e “I, Francis Sgambelluri, declare myself to be the DISCOVERER of the true beginning of the Universe”, è un lavoro originalissimo che porta, passo dopo passo, all’origine dell’universo.  

Comunque alla fine del mio articolo c’è scritto: “Having said that, if you found the article interesting, spread the word, send it to whoever you want, even to magazines and newspapers, obviously “leaving my name and my copyright”, thank you!” Quindi this copyright COPYRIGHT hope it’s enough to protect my work, di protegere il mio lavoro dai pagliatori, dai ladri delle opere altrui.

In “Bad Astronomy sotto, che io ho trovato su Internet, Google, c’è il nome di Filip Nemeri

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from …https://www.amazon.it › Bad-Astronomy-Misconceptio…

Philip Plait clears up every misconception on astronomy and space you never … Though some may find him strident, Plait succeeds brilliantly because his …

Hai visitato questa pagina in data 20/05/22

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses … – Amazon.ithttps://www.amazon.it › B0014ESXVY

“Bad Astronomy is just plain good! Philip Plait clears up every misconception on astronomy and space you never knew you suffered from.

Sono stato invitato e onorato anche dalla Oxford University to tallk about my work…

Thank you, now you know readers “My ideas are my ideas” and the thieves, those who plagiarize the work of others should be treated by the law as such!

Sorry for the confusion, I am a little too much worried and angry that certain people could rob others …

Francis Sgambellury

“Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal ‘Annalen der Physik’ , where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world”.

All scientists

They always start in their workies

From the existing universe

But have they ever wondered

What was there before this

Existing universe?

The universe didn’t start with the big bang

So?

Before arriving at the nothingness of nothingness, or at the beginning of the universe, I made a long journey and, once I arrived at my destination, I realized that I ended up where there is nothing of nothing. The nothingness of nothingness reigns everywhere. Before me there is only infinity and above my head the universe that I have just left behind. A unique and unwelcoming view surrounds me. I decide to take a dip in the immense. I have no sense of time. I travel with the mind and when you travel with the mind you can go around the Big Whole in the blink of an eye. The speed of the mind, and one can be a master of this art only and only if one has a real or imaginative knowledge of it, the speed of the mind, however, compared to that of the light is much slower than that of an old tortoise. In any case, at one point I turn around as I swoop down and, amazed, I notice that the universe in which I had traveled was reduced to a mammoth ball. At this point I thought I was going to see other bloated balls, but the void of nothingness was now in every point around me, just a 360 degrees open space and the big ball that was getting smaller and smaller and nothing else. There was no more reason for me to go further from where I was. And then to find what? I returned to my ball, to my universe and resumed the journey towards the Milky Way, towards home.

I was born the 11 February 1942 in an old house in Pantaleo, under a mountain called Timpa in dialect. When I left this place, around 15 years, I spoke only the Pantaleo dialect, I imitated the sounds of animals and that of natural phenomena – thunder, rain, wind, etc. Since that farewell to my family, my Timpa and my animals, my life has been nothing more than a single battle in order to be able to study.

(more…)

“Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal ‘Annalen der Physik’ , where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world”.

I don’t understand why I didn’t grasp it before. Yet it was easy to imagine. God represents Nothingness of Nothingness, that is what we don’t know and never will. It is something that could be as big as the head of a pin or big as the whole space. In all its vastness or microscopic nature there isn’t a single billionth of a billionth of space different from all the rest. Everything is the same. This is the primordial space and also the house of Nothingness of Nothingness.

It took me 80 years to figure it out. God = to Nothingness of Nothingness. No one, since this story began, has ever discovered a single real phenomenon in it: just as in Nothingness of Nothingness, with the difference the last one is a real empty phenomenon and God only an invented concept. Of course, it can’t be excluded. We can, indeed, we must conceive that the first particle appeared by chance, spontaneuosly from Nothingness of Nothingness, that is from an infinite void. We can also imagine that the primordial particle has, over billions and billions of years of evolution, doubled so many times itself to create a physical mass huge enough to detonate the big bang and, therefore, create the universe we know today. This intuition, if true, would lead our big bang, from its current position, to the true beginning of the universe billions and billions of years before.

(more…)

This is my thesis, the thesis supported by my 80 years dedicated to understanding man and the universe. For me, in fact, the universe in which we live, starting from its smallest particle that appeared by chance up to its largest galactic mass, is a unique and insurmountable irrationality. No god, no scientist, no philosopher, metaphysician, astronomer, man could never, despite of all his talents, science and creativity, never would be able to create a world more worse, hellish and meaningless than ours: a unique and insurmountable monstrosity.

Let us not be influenced by the fragrance of the roses, flowers, the beautiful landscapes, the first love, because these dazzles one day, if we wake up from the natural sleep, we then discover that they were nothing else than the prelude to a nightmare to come.

The Earth we live on, together with the solar system, are nothing more than a fabric of endless catastrophe. Plants, species, herbivores and carnivores, including homo sapiens sapiens, from birth to death know nothing more than a battle fought day by day and only to stay temporarily alive, just the time to discover that they are living in the worst of all possible worlds.

(more…)

The four pillars which hold up the cosmic edifice are nothingness of nothingness, the proto-element, space and time.

The human species

Since we humans became a thinking species, we have sought to understand who created us, where we come from, who created the world, who lived in the sky, where we went after we died, etc. etc. In this respect, over the millennia of history, the human species has invented masses and masses of fairy tales, of stories, of mythologies about gods and other fanciful beings which I don’t want to list here. That is not the purpose of this article. Here I would like to propose to you the origins of the universe. The rest should be easy to understand.

The universe, as we know it today, is supported by four fundamental pillars, i.e., on nothingness of nothingness, on the proto-element, on space and on time.

(more…)

In two words: factories of the mind. Let’s look at them a little close. Meanwhile, when I write saying that the universities are factories of the mind, I mean factories of the State, of the Church, of the Capitalism, of Military Academies, of Science in general, etc., this confirms their servile function towards their masters. Furthermore, I don’t say this because I want to offend them, much less insult university students, graduates or because I am envious since I am not a graduate. At all. This thought has never even crossed my mind, especially since I don’t see graduates and non-graduates around, I only see human beings. When I write saying that universities are factories of the mind at the service of the Powerful Men, I write it because in reality they are so. Nobody is born with a degree or a specialization. Anyone who has a brain knows this, understands it. He/she doesn’t say it because certain things are not said, but this is the reality, a somewhat uncomfortable reality according to certain customs, but we have enough of falsehood and nonsense in this discriminatory and absurd world and we certainly don’t intend to make it even more unlivable.

(more…)

I have spoken in these days about my autobiography. Now I would like to talk about my life by giving you a self-definition of its concreteness and physical evolution.

To begin with, I am an animal that represents the inanimate and the animated world in miniature.

What does it mean “world” for you ?, someone asks me.

I answer.

World for me means something that is formed by a set of atoms grouped in a small space of the universe that make up the inanimate and the animated phenomena that inhabit it and last as long as they can and then disappear.

From where come from these atoms?

(more…)

Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal “Annalen der Physik” where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world.

In what follows in this article, I will try to sketch the true basis of the universe and life. Don’t misunderstand me. I’m not a madman and much less one who goes on looking for awards, I am one who is interested to know the heart and soul of the reality that has created us and the world and this is what I will try to illustrate in the seven main definitions on the origin and evolution of the universe.

Let’s start with the first definition. At the beginning there was only “nothingness of nothingness”. At that time only this existed. You can see it as big as the point of a needle or immense as much as you manage to imagine it. There was nothing else, not even the tip of a pin. We call this place of nothingness of nothingness, the primordial basis of the universe.

The second definition. It was from nothingness of nothingness that was created spontaneously “the first particle”. This particle, after billions and billions of years, gave birth to the universe we know today. This is its origin and its birth and also the second basis of the universe. Of course, we could write an entire encyclopedia regarding this start, but we wouldn’t advance of a single comma for what concerns this initial moment.

(more…)

Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal “Annalen der Physik” where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world.

You might think I’m crazy, but I’m not crazy, crazy is who thinks I’m crazy, not to say an imbecile. Here are some of my Nobel discoveries:

1          “Nothingness of the nothingness”  or the basis of the universe, that is, a universe born by chance from nothingness of nothingness. This is the essence and the reality of the universe.

2          “The proto-element” or the beginning or the mother particle of the universe, that is, the particle that contains within itself all the elements to create the universe we know today. This is the birth of the universe.

(more…)

Things as they are

and not as we want them to be

I have something to say about the universe that Mr Copernicus didn’t have,

I have something to say about the universe that Mr Newton didn’t have,

I have something to say about the universe that Mr Einstein didn’t have,

I have something to say about the universe that Mr Hawking didn’t have:

I know the origins, the roots and the base of the universe that they didn’t know.

What distinguishes me from these 4 brains is also what follows:

(more…)

If Scott Fischer became a great man, he didn’t become so because he was an excellent mountaineer, much less because he was the head of the business Mountain Madness, even less because he was an American and let’s not talk about being a good family man; Scott Fischer has become a great man because the society, despite all its pitfalls, has failed to make out of him a social robot. This is the portrait I made of this personage while I was reading “The Climb: Tragic Ambitions on Everest”, Anatoli Boukreev and G. Weston DeWalt, and this is also the most beautiful thing that could happen to a man.

First picture of the universe

For all those who love,

not lies told by interested parties

from millennia to millennia

but for all those who love truth and reality.

Let’s see, for an instant, all the phenomena that make up the entire universe, not the way we want to see them, but for what they really are: things without names, naked and rudimentary objects in an immense vacuum. This is their reality. Seeing them so, how would they appear to us? They would appear as lifeless matter, blind bodies, bodies big and small, strong and weak, bare and barren, of long and short duration. In short, blind bodies and nothing else.

The universe, when we see it as it is, we realize that it is only a mixture of bodies of all imaginable and unimaginable dimensions, structures, properties, bodies and bodies ourselves. Voilà its reality: a mass of objects, of phenomena, of wonders and nightmares, nothing more, nothing less than a mass of physical elements that roar chaotically in an infinite vacuum, crashing blindly against one another and, in the end, they destroy themselves by losing and disintegrating in the immensity they are in. This is our universe and this is also its ultimate truth and reality.

Someone of you may say: “It’s not true that the universe is only a mass of physical objects and nothing more. It’s enough to take us with our creativity, thoughts, believes, cultures, to demonstrate that what you just said is wrong”.

To this remark I would reply by saying that, if we see this lifeless mass of objects that constitute the whole universe only in the short run, then the remark is correct. Correct, of course, up to a certain point, since all the values we gave to the universe are not its, are ours, we gave them to it. Instead, if we see this mass of objects that constitute the whole universe in the long run, in millions and billions of years, then we realize that we, for this mass of objects constantly in collision with one another, we are for them only momentary dust, pus, itch, disease, rubbish or, if you want, why not, a momentary decoration and nothing else.

In the next post, the second.

or

My Singapore’s speech

Part four

 In this chat, has man a sense in the world in which he lives?,I will talk about cosmic reality, cosmic reality as it is and not how we want it to be. Forgive me if I insist in these two ways of seeing the world: one objective and one subjective

I divide the world into real and not real. Particles, atoms, molecules, all physical things are real; ideas, theories, concepts, are unreal in the sense that they are not physical, they exist thanks to the physical world. This last one istotally independent from the human world.Sure, we can have a brief, a very brief influence on it, a locally influence, of course, this yes, but, in the long run, the world will be always the old world.Life and harmony are a temporary phenomenon in our universe; chaos, instead, is its real stabilized nature: entropy and the second law of thermodynamics require it.

(more…)

or

My Singapore’s speech

“For a new vision of the universe and of the meaning of life.”

Orazio Guglielmini

Part two

The history of the universe has many endings – big crunch, big rip, big freeze, big bounce, etc., – but not a single beginning. No one dares to go beyond Max Planck’s wall or, more easily said, beyond the Big Bang. Everything started at this moment. But the Big Bang is not the beginning of the universe. Absolutely not. It’s ridiculous just to think that the Big Bang appeared out of nothing. Another kind of stationary universe. When this event happened, between thirteen and fourteen billion years ago, billion plus billion less, the universe was only halfway through its journey.

(more…)

“The universe as it is

and not for how we want it

to be.”

Orace Guglielmini

To begin with, WE DON’T GROW UP TO LIVE, WE GROW UP TO DIE. We are constructed, piece by piece, not for life, but for death. No one escapes this blind verdict. Slaves, prisoners, serfs, from birth to death, of a nightmare we call life. All along our existential torture we are at the mercy of something we never saw or spoke with. Born, therefore, not to live, but to die. Each second, each heart bit, each look, each word, is a second, a heart bit, a look and a word less to live. Life runs towards death, towards the end, the end of the end. The unnamable decided our destiny before we were born.

(more…)

If the so-called “human being”, when we go to the heart of the matter, cannot do anything else, but only fill his stomach and kill his fellow men, I of this “human being” don’t know what to do except to eliminate him.

owHow?

I put him in a cannon and then pull the trigger.

(more…)

“As long as we do not understand that the worst people in the world are those who govern and have governed it, we have not yet understood anything about ourselves or the world in which we live.”

 Orazio Guglielmini

Here is how the great man expresses himself in this painting business:

“I have to say that I love bright colors. When I get to heaven, I intend to spend a considerable part of my first million years painting to get to the essence of the subject. So, I will need a palette even more vivid than the one I have down here. There will be a whole range of new and wonderful colors to delight the celestial eye, “from the DVD History, Winston Churchill, the lion of England.

(more…)

Science cannot know whether there is a God or not, so says the Canadian astrophysicist and cosmologist Hubert Reeves. Science is not moral, it doesn’t tell us what is good and what is bad, science tells us only how things are. However, he doesn’t believe that a Mozart or a Beethoven could be created purely by chance. Neither does he believe in an organising principle. His inner conviction is that something exists, but he doesn’t know what. This is how Reeves continues when asked if God exists or not.

(more…)

This story has now exceeded every limit. But, then, who tells us, that it is not an all dirty game to cheat people, to abuse them of their sentimental feelings? And not only. Who gets the advantages in this discriminatory and suspicious story? Let’s see.

1)      Newspapers, magazines, TV, web, etc.

2)      The Brexit.

3)      The parents of the child. Someone, perhaps, offered them a lot of money as long as they were agree with the game and kept their mouth shut.

4)      Politicians holding millions, if not billions, of people out of breath all throughout the planet: it is a great success for them, isn’t it?

(more…)