Francis Sgambelluri's English Blog

20 Jan 2023

The Cosmic Snail and the Mind

By Francis Sgambelluri

The Cosmic Snail and the Mind

Science, do you mean real science?

The one that says the end was

Already in the beginning

That’s what I mean.

This is yet to be discovered.

“Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal ‘Annalen der Physik’, where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something”; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world.

The soul doesn’t exist, neither does the spirit, they are concepts like Zeus and Brahma; the memory, instead, exists, I identify it with the mind.

The soul, has anyone seen it? The spirit, has anyone seen it? The memory? This is a physical part of a physical experience. So, even if you can’t see it, it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

I remember when my sister got married; I remember the never-ending stair as I went up the Eiffel Tower; I remember when I climbed le Petit Ferret, near Mont Blanc, in Val d’Aosta. The memory is physical, therefore mental. The memory has deep roots. This kind of roots can sleep forever or be awakened at any moment and in any place by conscious matter. But, my sister’s wedding, the stairway of the Eiffel Tower, the ascent of le Petit Ferret, if compared to the deep memory of the mind, they are very recent.

13 Jan 2023

The Mind is faster than Light *

By Francis Sgambelluri

The Mind is faster than Light

Exists a real science?

Yes, it exists

The article you’re going to read

Talks about a new real science

Have a good reading.

We are made of atoms as any other phenomena existing in the whole universe: stars, planets, oceans, mountains, volcanoes, trees, living beings, all built piece by piece of atoms, particles, mini pieces of matter. The entire universe is teeming with atoms and particles. Atoms mixing with other atoms, atoms eating each other, fighting with each other, supporting each other, destroying each other, cuddling each other, mating, hating, loving each other. Ours is a world of atoms and created by atoms. No matter what appearance the immense takes, it is always and everywhere made of atoms.

Imagination, a very important tool of the brain, was born from atoms and not atoms from imagination. The same with thought, invention, spirit. If we wanted to create a phenomenology of the spirit, not according to Hegel, but according to “real science” and in an atomic sense, this could revolution our usual vision of life and teach us how to travel with the mind till the origin of the universe, that is till the origin of the proto-element in an instant.

21 Dec 2022

Logical and Factual truths

By Francis Sgambelluri

Logical and Factual truths

“The father of science, Democritus, when the Greeks asked him to show them what an atom was, he took a piece of cheese, put it on a table, took a knife and then in front of them started cutting the cheese into two pieces. He went on cutting each piece into two pieces until he couldn’t cut the last piece anymore. Then Democritus stopped cutting, looked at the people who were watching him carefully and said: ‘Here is your atom, the piece that I no longer can divide into two pieces’. This is not theory, this is science. Science can exist without theory, but not theory without science”.

Bart Kosko*, in his book “The Fuzzy-Thought”, defines logical truths and factual truths as follows: “The difference between logical truth and factual truth founds two vast theories, the theory of coherence and the theory of correspondence. Logical truth is part of the theory of coherence or truth as coherence. The statement 1 + 1 = 2 is true because we have consistently applied the rules of mathematics. The fairy tale ‘the little mermaid’is true in the sense that it is coherent, that is internally consistent, but doesn’t correspond to any real fact.” In fact, in nature, ‘the little mermaid’doesn’t exist.

02 Dec 2022

Has man a sense and a future in the world in which he lives?

By Francis Sgambelluri

Has man a sense and a future in the world in which he lives?

I’ll try to sketch, in this article, our cosmic reality. I see it divided into two categories: objective and subjective or real and not real. Particles, atoms, molecules, all physical things are real; ideas, theories, concepts, are unreal in the sense that they are not physical. The physical world is totally independent from the human world, we, without the physical world, wouldn’t exist. Sure, we can have a brief, a very brief influence on it, a local influence, but in the long run the world would starts again and again to be the world. Differently said, harmony is a temporary phenomenon, chaos is its real stabilized nature.

This picture leads me to talk about man and his place in the universe, not in a wishful way, not in an academic or philosophic way, but in a palpable concrete way. I’ll do it in giving eight brief pictures of the universe, and in these eight brief pictures I’ll try to describe it and our position in it as objective as I can.

First picture of the universe. Let’s see, for an instant, all the phenomena that make up the entire universe, not the way we want to see them, but for what they are: things without names, naked bare objects in an immense vacuum. This is their reality. Seeing them so, how would they appear to us? They would appear as bodies, bodies big and small, strong and weak, bare and barren, of long and short duration, bodies, phenomena and nothing else.

21 Oct 2022

My science, My philosophy

By Francis Sgambelluri

My science and my philosophy

The so-called science – quantum physics, entanglement, mathematics, spacetime – for what concerns the base and the meaning of the universe, cannot help us. It is only a mental artifice, an Everest of artificial symbols and thoughts… Our interest, in this field, is associated with “the most reliable facts”. The lack of these is the lack of a true dialogue both with the universe and among ourselves.

The science that Immanuel Kant called, not synthetic knowledge, but analytical knowledge, is also my science. In fact, it is precisely what I apply in the construction of the cosmic evolution. In other words, synthetic science has to do with facts, experience, empirical studies, etc.; analytical science has to do with logical, reasoning, concepts, etc. It is important to emphasize that synthetic knowledge can change over time, but this doesn’t happen with analytical knowledge: man is mortal, synthetic knowledge; nothingness of the nothingness is immortal, analytical knowledge.

In this sense, my science is a science that goes beyond ordinary science. Ordinary scientists are “the laborers of science”, without wanting to offend them. They, with some exceptions, don’t go beyond the microscope and telescope. Moreover, they belong to the System and, therefore, aren’t free thinkers. Kantian analytical science, begins right here, beyond the microscope and telescope, particularly when we are talking about nothingness of nothingness and the history of the universe.

14 Oct 2022

The Four Pillars Which Hold up the Cosmic Edifice (2)

By Francis Sgambelluri

The Four Pillars Which Hold up the Cosmic Edifice (2)

Love, passion, knowledge and hard work

I would like to say, in a synthetic way, that I didn’t arrive to this cosmic knowledge by chance, by taking measurements, or by experiments, or looking under a microscope or through a telescope, I arrived to it with love, passion, will to know the real truth of our world and hard work.

The universe, seen in its totality, is an orphan

If we want to consider it in a human way, the universe is an orphan. You might say, “No, the nothingness of nothingness is its parent.” This is true. The universe came into existence thanks to nothingness of nothingness and the first particle. However, in spite of it, you can feel even sorry for this lonely big huge phenomenon.

The universe is a metaphysical world

08 Oct 2022

The Four Pillars Which Hold up the Cosmic Edifice

By Francis Sgambelluri

The Four Pillars Which Hold up the Cosmic Edifice

The universe is supported by four fundamental pillars. Here they are:

1 nothingness of nothingness

2 the proto-element

3 space

4 time

Let’s look at them one by one.

The first: nothingness of nothingness

Why we define it as “nothingness of nothingness”? Because in “nothing”, as it is seen by science, there are particles, atoms, molecules and therefore it is not correct to define it as nothing, but it is not so in nothingness of nothingness. In nothingness of nothingness there is nothing, nonexistence, zero, nullity, just an endless void and nothing else. Nothingness of nothingness is unique, is singular and nobody and nothing inhabits it. This is the first pillar of our cosmic edifice.

01 Oct 2022

Einstein, a pillar of modern physics made of Papier-mâché (5) (6) (7) (8)

By Francis Sgambelluri

a pillar of modern physics made of Papier-mâché (5) (6) (7) (8)

5

The existence of a phenomenon, be it small or big, is relative to its physical composition. There are phenomena whose existence lasts a moment – a neutron and an antineutron that collide at birth, for example – and others that last billions of years. Their atomic composition and structure decide the duration of their existence.

At the beginning of the 1920s, Einstein attacked the French philosopher, Henri Bergson, arguing that science knew it better than philosophy, just as Newton had done a couple of centuries earlier with the German philosopher Leibniz. However, if time doesn’t exist, the “duration” of Bergson does exist. In fact, physical and biological bodies, including the body of Einstein, must deal, not with time understood in an Einsteinian way, but with the durée of Bergson. Every phenomenon composed of atoms, in the entire universe, must deal with Bergson’s duration and not with the time of Einstein. Perhaps the philosophical intuition of Bergson was lacking in the touchy scientist. Even his twin paradox is a question mark, of course.

In physics, the twin paradox is an thought experiment in special relativity involving identical twins: one of them makes a journey into the space in a high-speed rocket and returns back home after a short time to find out that his twin brother, who remained on Earth, has aged much more then him. What does all this relativity business mean? Only this. One thing is to walk down from Mont Blanc and another to do it with a hang glider: in the first case it takes 10 hours, in the second only 10 minutes. The same example, even if mine is less sophisticated than Einstein’s, applies with the twin brothers. (more…)

16 Sep 2022

Einstein, a pillar of modern physics made of Papier-mâché * (1) (2) (3) (4)

By Francis Sgambelluri

a pillar of modern physics made of Papier-mâché * (1) (2) (3) (4)

Einstein, a pillar of modern physics made of Papier-mâché *

1

Sometimes I would have liked to be lazy and spend the rest of my days peacefully and in anonymity. Instead it’s impossible. In this last time I also have nightmares. I see myself sucked into a cosmic crater, in one of those craters that Einstein theorized about in his special or perhaps in his general relativity. Of course, he doesn’t call them cosmic craters, but objects trapped in the curvature of space-time. I can understand a bit about curvatures, but I don’t understand anything about space-time.

If you don’t understand anything about space-time, where’s the problem?

It’s not exactly so. I don’t understand anything in the way Einstein intends them, not in the way I understand space and time.

Well, demonstrate that Einstein’s theory is wrong.

It’s not easy.

There’s no other way.

I wonder, since, honestly, nowadays everybody knows that neither time nor space exists, now, if so, how could he create the theory of special or general relativity based in the existence of space-time? A real block. I can’t follow him.

01 Sep 2022

The universe in the pocket or All what you need to know about it (2)

By Francis Sgambelluri

An idea, to be valid, must start from somewhere. I start from nothingness of nothingness, which seems to be, in fact, exactly nothingness of nothingness that gave way to the life of all the phenomena in the universe, and this is a good idea and a good base to start our discussion.

Nothingness of nothingness is the true beginning of the universe. A metaphysical basis, but this metaphysical basis is inevitable in order to support and understand the reality that surrounds us. There are no other stories here, this is the Story and the History of our universe. Before it there was nothing or an empty huge void without anything. How could I describe this void? It can be seen from all sides as an immense and infinite space, or as small as the tip of a pin. This tip, over the years and centuries, transforms itself, randomly, but transforms itself into a particle, a very tiny particle and the void is no longer empty. Something now inhabits it. This first particle, like the DNA cells and genes that double, also this particle doubles and transforms itself constantly. Some say in strings, others in quanti (particles), others in quarks and still others in protons, neutrons, atoms. Meanwhile billions and billions of years have passed since its start and the void has become full and become so full to create the suitable and sufficient material to produce a nuclear reaction and finally generate the Big Bang. This, the Big Bang, in a flash of time, filled a part of the void with matter, and this matter today is full of what we call planets, stars, galaxies, black holes, white holes and other phenomena. Voilà the base, the beginning, the birth and the evolution of the universe. Of course, there are other versions of the beginning of the universe, but they are not scientifically and philosophically convincing, much less rationally, they could be seen only as mythological stuff.

The nothingness of nothingness, then? Well, after all nobody can prevent us from seeing it as something and, in fact, something is: it is the nothingness of nothingness! This conceptual phenomenon comes before any other. Without it, nothing would have existed, nothing at all. The “All” and the “Nothing” nestle in the “nothingness of nothingness”. The All and the Nothing are our first and last reality. We are the Whole and the Nothing in this sense: once we are transformed from nothing to everything and another from everything to nothing. If we have a body, a head, a brain, a thought, we owe it to them: to the All and the Nothing. Without them, no universe, no solar system, no earth, no species and of any kind. All and Nothing, with the capital A and N, therefore, are our being, our body and our way of thinking and also the Theory of Everything for those who need it.

My goal, in these 10 posts is to conquer the spirit and the heart of the phenomenon of phenomena: the Universe in its Totality. How? I’m proving it post after post.

I want to know the reality of this mass of objects thrown everywhere in space. This is all I want to know. I’ve always wanted it. Perhaps, to create a work of this kind, it takes a touch of madness, of that phenomenon that pushes us relentlessly towards the deepest abyss of space and knowledge. knowledge, in fact, has something in common with the first particle, the two complement each other: no particle, no knowledge and vice versa. Thus, when we push ourselves into the infinite abyss of matter and the nothingness of nothingness, all the means of knowledge come together in a single point: to make the universe transparent with a cosmic illumination enclosed in a single spark and we, creatures aware of ourselves and of what surrounds us, we are this spark that illuminates and sees everything. Poetry, hallucinations, madness, you say. No, I answer, Science with a capital S.

Copyright

25 Aug 2022

The universe in the pocket or all what you need to know about it

By Francis Sgambelluri

The universe in the pocket or All what you need to know about it

Most scientists

They always start their studies

From the existing universe

But they never wondered

What happened there

Before the existing universe

Since the universe

Surely

Didn’t start with the big bang.

“Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal ‘Annalen der Physik’ , where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world”.

A short announcement

I diluted 4 pages written on “The universe in the pocket” in 10 posts. I hope, if my forces allow me, to publish them on Facebook, every other day a post in Italian and a post in English.

In these 10 posts I would like to sketch the history of the universe from its origins to its end. The knowledge of our origins, since man became aware of his life, has never stopped searching for them. Throughout history the best heads have spoken and written of cooked and raw in this subject, they have made bloodbaths fighting for this and for that origin and, even today, this idea sows deaths and mental confusions in every corner of the Earth.

I don’t know how to say it without being taken for a fool or an arrogant, but I do know that we, the homo species, cannot live in a world we don’t know, not in serenity, however. I know this. My endeavor in this work is this: since the old science couldn’t give an answer to this important question and not even the new one, but, someone, sooner or later, must do it. I did it myself.

My intention on what I am about to write is to make my concept of the universe easier to understand. I would start by describing it in an evolutionary way. Not in a biological way like the Darwinian one, but in a physical way starting from Nothingness of Nothingness, then with the first particle, then with all the other metamorphoses that took place along evolution up to the Big Bang, then, after the Big Bang, with the first star, the first galaxy, the first supernova, the Solar System, the Earth, the seas, life, species and, finally, the human creature. After all, we are what we think and what we think is not ours, it belongs to the universe that created the elements for us to be.

We are, in short, a miniature of the universe, a physical, conscious, human universe. All the elements that make up our body are found in the universe. And what does this mean? It means that we can understand it as we understand our mother: we come into the world from its womb. In short, the universe is just a little bigger than us physically, that’s all!

Here is the demonstration. Thinking with our mind, we can, in a matter of seconds, travel to the Big Bang, to the First Particle, to Nothingness of Nothingness. Why? Because our roots are there and we remain in contact with everything that has proceeded us in an abstract, physical and biological way.

In short, the lord universe is just a little bigger than us physically, that’s all!

Jacques Monod’s theory of “Chance and Necessity”, which fits perfectly with Darwinian evolutionary theory, could also be applied to the theory of the universe starting from the Nothingness of Nothingness and reaching us. Here, however, in this theory, it is not the biological species that arrive on the terrestrial screen by chance and affirm themselves by necessity, here we are dealing with physical phenomena that are realized in the universe by chance and affirm themselves by necessity starting from their relative mass.

My theory on the evolution of the universe cannot be falsified. Here I recall the concept of Karl Popper. To falsify it, it would be necessary to demonstrate that another concept such as, the All of the All is opposed to Nothingness of Nothingness, only this could falsify it, but until we find that at the beginning there was the All of the All we cannot falsify it and, therefore, it will remain a full-fledged science, just as until a white raven is found, the concept of the black raven will remain so. Of course, one could always say: “Before there was the previous universe, therefore, the All of the All”. Well, then another might say: “Before the black crow there was the white crow”, and so on. It would never end.

In Darwin’s theory, chance and necessity guide the winning species; in the Big Bang theory, the physical phenomena scattered throughout the universe born from the Big Bang. In my theory of the beginning of the universe, starting from Nothingness of Nothingness and arriving at the Big Bang, it is all an abstract, logical reasoning and can only be denied with another abstract, logical and more truthful reasoning than mine. Before the Big Bang, however, there is no place for science as we know it today. It is a hermetically sealed world. To enter it, first you need to have a good knowledge of the universe born from the Big Bang and then, and only then, with induction, deduction, reason, abstract but actually concrete science have free entry into the world born from the first particle and reaching the Big Bang event. Those who lack these prerogatives, will remain outside.

And then, we can also put it like this, who could ever go beyond the Big Bang and then to the Nothingness of Nothingness? The chances of falsifying the concept of Nothingness of Nothingness, both logically and scientifically, are almost non-existent. They can be falsified from the first to the last mythological concept, but the Nothingness of Nothingness can’t be falsified. This, the Nothingness of Nothingness, can be considered in good hands and also considered the indispensable basis of the universe.

The article you are reading is divided in 10 posts. With this article I give to the whole of humanity, and I don’t want to sound arrogant, the beginning and the end of the universe, not fantastically, not mythologically, not for how the science manuals describe it and not even for how the eaters of numbers and equations want it ( it is not my intention to offend these gentlemen, but I leave them the interpretation they want to give to my words ), but with a real start and a real end. The life of mankind and of every other species on Earth and in the Great Whole, is played out on this landscape, others are but don’t exist.

Copyright or all the rights belong to the respective owner

There are three more posts to come

18 Aug 2022

God is a deadly invention

By Francis Sgambelluri

God is a deadly invention, God: a deadly invention

God is not salvation

Religion is not salvation

God and religion are not salvation

God and religion are slavery

Slavery of the mind and slavery of the body

God is not love

God is not understanding

God is misery

God is bloodshed

God is misery and bloodshed

God is not a dream

God is not a joy

God is a nightmare

God is an endless mockery

A deadly invention against life and humanity

To all of you

Fools of the earth

If you don’t have any better idea

To live your lives:

Then get every day drunk and have fun!

18 Aug 2022

Extreme sports (1, 2, 3)

By Francis Sgambelluri

3), you’re welcome

Extreme sports (1)

Have you ever wondered what extreme sports are for? Have you ever wondered why no other animal on Earth, not only doesn’t do any extreme sports, but doesn’t do any sport at all? Why has no other monkey ever tried to climb the Everest for the fun of it? Why have I never seen a herd of hippos line up and then race for who from them gets to the nearest lake first and just for the pleasure of the victory? Why does no eagle fly into a dark cave and then communicate to his fellow creatures “I did this”? Why has no wildebeest ever tried to cross a river on a tightrope for the fun of it? Why dive in a shark-infested sea? Why, in short, why jump from the sky from an airplane without a parachute?

According to Aristotle, man is a rational animal. Pascal did not see it this way when he wrote: “All the unhappiness of men has only one source, that is, not knowing how to remain quiet in a room”. Here, thanks to Pascal, are some reasons why we do extreme sport, a sport we know in advance that it can cost us our life, yet we do it!

10 Aug 2022

The Bloodless Revolution

By Francis Sgambelluri

The Bloodless Revolution

Today, and we must admit it, even if our managers and owners of these media worldwide, may turn out to be on the wrong side of society, but, in reality, are they? Indeed, thanks to these media – Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, Web, Wikipedia, etc. -, thanks to them, the People of the whole world, the one who has been kept in chains and in cultural darkness for millennia, the one to whom education has not been and is still not at hand today, thanks to Facebook, Twitter, etc. , is becoming aware of how the pyramidal society in which we live of “homo species” is really built on this rock that turns and turns around the sun. THIS IS A REVOLUTION WITHOUT BLOOD SHEDDING, THE FRST OF ITS KIND IN THE ENTIRE WORLD.

We can say that from the Slave Revolution, which began with Spartacus, to that of the Magna Carta in England 1215, and ending with the Cuban one, none of them, except that of the Magna Carta, perhaps, none of them did not shed seas of blood, and what obtained? Those who wore the chains still wear them today. And not only. THE REVOLUTION WITHOUT THE SPILLING OF BLOOD is also instructive, educational, cultural, human on a world level, never before has the People, without which nothing is born, grows or flourishes, had a Revolution of this kind.

24 Jun 2022

My chat in Singapore

By Francis Sgambelluri

In this chat, has man a sense in the world in which he lives?, I will talk about cosmic reality, cosmic reality as it is and not how we want it to be. Forgive me if I insist in these two ways of seeing the world: one objective and one subjective. I divide the world into real and not real. Particles, atoms, molecules, all physical things are real; ideas, theories, concepts, are unreal in the sense that they are not physical, they exist thanks to the physical world. This last one is totally independent from the human world. Sure, we can have a brief, a very brief influence on it, a local influence, of course, this yes, but, in the long run, the world will be always the old world. Life and harmony are a temporary phenomenon in our universe; chaos and disasters, instead, are its real stabilized nature: entropy and the second law of thermodynamics require it.

Next post: first image of the universe (already published)

12 Jun 2022

From a metaphysical universe to a physical one

By Francis Sgambelluri

From a metaphysical universeto a physical one

“Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal ‘Annalen der Physik’ , where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world”.

All scientists

They always start in their workies

From an existing universe

But have they ever wondered

What was there before this

Existing universe?

The universe didn’t start with the big bang

So?

From the moment we start talking about a phenomenal universe, contemporarily we leave behind us the metaphysical one. But, then, do we really leave it behind us?

Classical physics, or the physics of the infinitely large and quantum physics, or the physics of the infinitely small, come, at a certain stage, into play with one another. From this contact large-small the phenomenal universe was born. But, what was there before them?

Nothingness of nothingness.

And before nothingness of nothingness?

Nothingness.

If we try to explain the universe in this way, it makes sense, so do we, and all becomes simple and clear. Otherwise, all is absurd, including ourselves!

Here is for you the Universe without tricks, simple to understand and with a few words!

Furthermore, I would like to add, that to the “Theory of Everything”, I’ll oppose the “Knowledge of Everything” which, in my opinion, makes sense, while the other one is only abstract nonsense.

09 Jun 2022

How to be cured from religion

By Francis Sgambelluri

How to be cured from religion

I read the Bible, almost from top to bottom, in French, English and Italian. When I read it in English, I was in Australia, in Melbourne, and I remember very well that I found the reading full of things that I didn’t find them mentally digestible, reasonable, human. Anyone who has read this book, perhaps understands me. In short, its reading is absurd when compared with real life.

In other words: Can we believe that a few millennia ago God created the world from nothing and in 7 days? Can we believe that the kangaroos were in Noah’s Ark and then swam to Australia? Can we believe, after seeing it from the sky, that the Earth is flat? I must continue? Thank you.

One time, instinctively and with all my strength, I threw the Bible I was reading against the window of my flat and broke the glass. Why read it, you may say, if you found it illegible? Because I wanted to understand, before having my own opinions on a book written by God himself!, and so at times I forced myself to read other books, not that I liked them, but because I wanted to know their content personally and to know it, I had first to read them.

20 May 2022

“I, Francis Sgambelluri, declare myself to be the DISCOVERER of the true beginning of the Universe” article pagiarized

By Francis Sgambelluri

Ho l’impressione che tra ieri e oggi questo mio articolo è stato plagiato si Facebook.

Vorrei chiedere, dato che l’ho pubblicato sul sito “ASTONOMY KNOWLEDGE” se ne sanno qualcosa.

Ho avuto un breve contatto per iscritto con “Filip Nemeri Astronomy Knowledge” e il suo comportamento mi ha sorpreso molto in negativo.

Il mio lavoro è conosciuto su Facebook, Twitter, Linkdin e non parliamo poi di libri e areticoli ecc. e “I, Francis Sgambelluri, declare myself to be the DISCOVERER of the true beginning of the Universe”, è un lavoro originalissimo che porta, passo dopo passo, all’origine dell’universo.

Comunque alla fine del mio articolo c’è scritto: “Having said that, if you found the article interesting, spread the word, send it to whoever you want, even to magazines and newspapers, obviously “leaving my name and my copyright”, thank you!” Quindi this copyright COPYRIGHT hope it’s enough to protect my work, di protegere il mio lavoro dai pagliatori, dai ladri delle opere altrui.

In “Bad Astronomy sotto, che io ho trovato su Internet, Google, c’è il nome di Filip Nemeri

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from …https://www.amazon.it › Bad-Astronomy-Misconceptio…

Philip Plait clears up every misconception on astronomy and space you never … Though some may find him strident, Plait succeeds brilliantly because his …

Hai visitato questa pagina in data 20/05/22

Bad Astronomy: Misconceptions and Misuses … – Amazon.ithttps://www.amazon.it › B0014ESXVY

“Bad Astronomy is just plain good! Philip Plait clears up every misconception on astronomy and space you never knew you suffered from.

Sono stato invitato e onorato anche dalla Oxford University to tallk about my work…

Thank you, now you know readers “My ideas are my ideas” and the thieves, those who plagiarize the work of others should be treated by the law as such!

Sorry for the confusion, I am a little too much worried and angry that certain people could rob others …

Francis Sgambellury

10 May 2022

Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill in the Mirror

By Francis Sgambelluri

Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill in the Mirror

“Germany should be bombed regularly

every 50 years even for no reason “.

Cit. Sir Winston Churchill

It’s time to make some comparisons between these two historical figures: Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill. I will be very brief and I hope not to say stupid things, I who am not a historian.

Art and politics, Adolf Hitler and Winston Churchill, had them in their blood and more precisely, the first, Adolf Hitler, had them in his heart; the second, Winston Churchill, had them in his brain. Of the first it is said that he was a monster, with a heart I would add; of the second it is said that he was a great man, with the brain I would add. Let’s start with the latter.

Sir Winston Churchill, thanks to his brain, he would have sent 400,000 soldiers, mostly British, to the slaughterhouse on the beach of Dunkirk if it would have been up to him, and perhaps the Second World War could have ended there; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, didn’t bomb those 400,000 thousand soldiers stranded in Dunkirk either from the air or from the ground; Sir Winston Churchill, thanks to his brain, in the Operation Catapult 1940, shot French ships, his allies, for fear that the Germans could seize them and then use the ships against the British; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, spared Paris and its monuments despite the negative behavior of the French against the Germans, particularly in the Versailles negotiations at the end of the First World War; Sir Winston Churchill, thanks to his brain, in 1940 many Londoners wanted peace, he wanted war and he got it; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, delayed his attack on Russia for three months (and it was fatal for him and Germany, some experts said, due to the change of season) to go to help the poor Italian soldiers who ended up under the fire of the Greeks; Sir Winston Churchill, while the war raged in the desert of El Alamein, he painted quietly and happily in a palace in Marrakech; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, had begun to understand at a certain moment of the war that his generals no longer obeyed him; Sir Winston Churchill, thanks to his brain, at the end of the Second World War, when Germany was now just a pile of debris, had Dresden and other German cities that still breathed razed to the ground; the Führer Adolf Hitler, thanks to his heart, in the last days of his life married his partner, Eva Braun, and then committed suicide together with his wife in order not to end, both he and she, neither alive nor dead in the hands of the enemy.

30 Apr 2022

I, Francis Sgambelluri, declare myself to be the DISCOVERER of the true beginning of the Universe

By Francis Sgambelluri

declare myself to be the DISCOVERER of the true beginning of the Universe

“Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal ‘Annalen der Physik’ , where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world”.

All scientists

They always start in their workies

From the existing universe

But have they ever wondered

What was there before this

Existing universe?

The universe didn’t start with the big bang

So?

Before arriving at the nothingness of nothingness, or at the beginning of the universe, I made a long journey and, once I arrived at my destination, I realized that I ended up where there is nothing of nothing. The nothingness of nothingness reigns everywhere. Before me there is only infinity and above my head the universe that I have just left behind. A unique and unwelcoming view surrounds me. I decide to take a dip in the immense. I have no sense of time. I travel with the mind and when you travel with the mind you can go around the Big Whole in the blink of an eye. The speed of the mind, and one can be a master of this art only and only if one has a real or imaginative knowledge of it, the speed of the mind, however, compared to that of the light is much slower than that of an old tortoise. In any case, at one point I turn around as I swoop down and, amazed, I notice that the universe in which I had traveled was reduced to a mammoth ball. At this point I thought I was going to see other bloated balls, but the void of nothingness was now in every point around me, just a 360 degrees open space and the big ball that was getting smaller and smaller and nothing else. There was no more reason for me to go further from where I was. And then to find what? I returned to my ball, to my universe and resumed the journey towards the Milky Way, towards home.

I was born the 11 February 1942 in an old house in Pantaleo, under a mountain called Timpa in dialect. When I left this place, around 15 years, I spoke only the Pantaleo dialect, I imitated the sounds of animals and that of natural phenomena – thunder, rain, wind, etc. Since that farewell to my family, my Timpa and my animals, my life has been nothing more than a single battle in order to be able to study.

17 Apr 2022

I invited to the UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD ?

By Francis Sgambelluri

I invited to the UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD ?

Mr. Priestly Williams writes on Facebook after reading my “The cosmic foundations and the discovery that God is = to Nothingness of Nothingness” and some other titles of my books that I have published:“The Trilogy”, namely “Flash about man and the universe”, “From nothingness of nothingness to virtual immortality”, and “Son of the elements and the big bang, the cosmic autobiography of a human being”, plus “The 4 pillars that support the universe and the before and the afterlife of the Big Bang”, published by Contro Corrente (Print MnM Edizions), plus the article I published on my blog: “Einstein, a pillar of modern physics made of papier mache or my Singapore speech”.

Here are his words:

“Are you over burdened by assignments? We can help you out. We have highly qualified and experienced expert in each field. Our fee is pocket friendly. We offer discounts to our clients with many orders. Kindly message us in case you need help. Thank you.

My reply:

Thank you so much Sir. I am very pleased and honored by your invitation to talk about my work in the prestigious University of Oxford. No Italian university has ever invited me or just considered my work. *

Still many thanks and greetings.

Francis Sgambelluri

* P. S. I don’t exclude the fact that to present my work, the University of Oxford would ask me for a fee. Anyhow, I’m sure that Mr. Priestly Williams will give me more details about it.

28 Mar 2022

The cosmic foundations and the discovery that God is = Nothingness of Nothingness

By Francis Sgambelluri

The cosmic foundations and the discovery that God is = Nothingness of Nothingness

“Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal ‘Annalen der Physik’ , where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world”.

I don’t understand why I didn’t grasp it before. Yet it was easy to imagine. God represents Nothingness of Nothingness, that is what we don’t know and never will. It is something that could be as big as the head of a pin or big as the whole space. In all its vastness or microscopic nature there isn’t a single billionth of a billionth of space different from all the rest. Everything is the same. This is the primordial space and also the house of Nothingness of Nothingness.

It took me 80 years to figure it out. God = to Nothingness of Nothingness. No one, since this story began, has ever discovered a single real phenomenon in it: just as in Nothingness of Nothingness, with the difference the last one is a real empty phenomenon and God only an invented concept. Of course, it can’t be excluded. We can, indeed, we must conceive that the first particle appeared by chance, spontaneuosly from Nothingness of Nothingness, that is from an infinite void. We can also imagine that the primordial particle has, over billions and billions of years of evolution, doubled so many times itself to create a physical mass huge enough to detonate the big bang and, therefore, create the universe we know today. This intuition, if true, would lead our big bang, from its current position, to the true beginning of the universe billions and billions of years before.

16 Mar 2022

A Revolution with the capital R

By Francis Sgambelluri

A Revolution with the capital R

Today, and we must admit it, even if the managers and masters of these means of communication worldwide, may turn out to be on the wrong social side, but in fact, are they? Indeed, thanks to these media – Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, Web, Wikipedia, etc. – thanks to them, the people of the whole world, the one for whom education is not always at hand, are becoming aware of how physically and politically this rock that turns and turns around the Sun is really made and ruled. Conscious or unconscious, it is a real Revolution without bloodshed. And not only. It is also instructive, educational, cultural and a human revolution, never done it before. Such a Revolution (with a capital R) on a planetary level could bring about social changes that we don’t realize it yet.

I have taught in different countries and in my classrooms there were sometimes 20 students and sometimes more and others less, but today when I publish an article on Facebook, Twitter, etc., it could be seen and read by thousands of people. A big difference, isn’t it? Thanks to all those who deserve them!

13 Mar 2022

My realism: we live in the worst of all possible worlds

By Francis Sgambelluri

My realism: we live in the worst of all possible worlds

This is my thesis, the thesis supported by my 80 years dedicated to understanding man and the universe. For me, in fact, the universe in which we live, starting from its smallest particle that appeared by chance up to its largest galactic mass, is a unique and insurmountable irrationality. No god, no scientist, no philosopher, metaphysician, astronomer, man could never, despite of all his talents, science and creativity, never would be able to create a world more worse, hellish and meaningless than ours: a unique and insurmountable monstrosity.

Let us not be influenced by the fragrance of the roses, flowers, the beautiful landscapes, the first love, because these dazzles one day, if we wake up from the natural sleep, we then discover that they were nothing else than the prelude to a nightmare to come.

The Earth we live on, together with the solar system, are nothing more than a fabric of endless catastrophe. Plants, species, herbivores and carnivores, including homo sapiens sapiens, from birth to death know nothing more than a battle fought day by day and only to stay temporarily alive, just the time to discover that they are living in the worst of all possible worlds.

27 Feb 2022

The transparent universe

By Francis Sgambelluri

The transparent universe

A cosmic awareness

gives us a healthy and full idea

how the universe is concretely made

and not as we want it to be”!

With this post, friends of Facebook, of Twitter and of the Web, I will give you the whole universe and forever. Do you think, maybe, that I’m crazy telling you this? At all! Read this article first and then decide if I am crazy or you, perhaps, a bit surprised by this argument!

Let’s begin:

This post could make some chattering, not noises created by numbers, equations, particles, quants, none of this stuff, but real chattering or, if you want, noises of species, of planets, of the solar system, of galaxies and, finally, cosmic noises, noises never heard before and much less will be heard in the future, they are, putting all of them together, a unique murmuring universal sound in the background.

Our universe, finally!, has become transparent, all crystal clear, there are no more mysteries about it, a single and universal mirror. In fact, once we know that our universe has a metaphysical background, that it has a beginning and an end, and from its first particle to the last of which it is composed, scientifically speaking, is pure irrationality. In short, once we have taken consciously a realistic picture of our universe, then we can say that we understand who we are and the world and the universe in which we live.

16 Feb 2022

The Four Pillars Which Hold up the Cosmic Edifice *

By Francis Sgambelluri

The four pillars which hold up the cosmic edifice are nothingness of nothingness, the proto-element, space and time.

The human species

Since we humans became a thinking species, we have sought to understand who created us, where we come from, who created the world, who lived in the sky, where we went after we died, etc. etc. In this respect, over the millennia of history, the human species has invented masses and masses of fairy tales, of stories, of mythologies about gods and other fanciful beings which I don’t want to list here. That is not the purpose of this article. Here I would like to propose to you the origins of the universe. The rest should be easy to understand.

The universe, as we know it today, is supported by four fundamental pillars, i.e., on nothingness of nothingness, on the proto-element, on space and on time.

11 Feb 2022

Frank Ferreri’s existential testament

By Francis Sgambelluri

Frank Ferreri’s existential testament

“Death will come

And it will have your eyes”, Pavese says

“Not mine, I say

Because I’ll have them before her.”

In the meantime, I would like to say that, despite all the adversities I had to face in life, I have achieved what I wanted to achieve: to understand my fellow men, the universe and the world in which I was born and lived. In my way I understood them.

Sure, I could have committed suicide without saying a word, as most suicides do. Instead, I do the opposite, I write the reasons that led me to this act and I say that for me suicide was one of the most convenient things of my life: I could get rid of it when and how I wanted.

My death, therefore. In fact, I had already decided on this act towards the end of the Sixties, in Paris. Then it didn’t happen. Then, the “then” of this time, became the then of today and between these two “thens” passed more than 50 years. I reasoned like this in those past times and I still think like this:

Being born from nothing and then returning to another nothing without a “but” and without a “why”, is not fun for a mind that thinks and from any point of view one sees it.

06 Feb 2022

What are really the universities?

By Francis Sgambelluri

What are really the universities?

In two words: factories of the mind. Let’s look at them a little close. Meanwhile, when I write saying that the universities are factories of the mind, I mean factories of the State, of the Church, of the Capitalism, of Military Academies, of Science in general, etc., this confirms their servile function towards their masters. Furthermore, I don’t say this because I want to offend them, much less insult university students, graduates or because I am envious since I am not a graduate. At all. This thought has never even crossed my mind, especially since I don’t see graduates and non-graduates around, I only see human beings. When I write saying that universities are factories of the mind at the service of the Powerful Men, I write it because in reality they are so. Nobody is born with a degree or a specialization. Anyone who has a brain knows this, understands it. He/she doesn’t say it because certain things are not said, but this is the reality, a somewhat uncomfortable reality according to certain customs, but we have enough of falsehood and nonsense in this discriminatory and absurd world and we certainly don’t intend to make it even more unlivable.

04 Dec 2021

Who are the real young and who are the real old

By Francis Sgambelluri

Who are the real young and who are the real old

It’s true, “the years pass quickly”, but the youth, paradoxically, can remain because it depends, not on the years, but on our brain. Old age, in reality, has nothing to do with age; old age, as we understand it, doesn’t exist. Life, understood in a natural way, is a single cycle, it starts from birth and ends with death. This is not how the mental, cultural, historical and philosophical age works. A 25 year young man and an 80 year old man may be older, culturally speaking, the young man and not the 80 year old man. Old age is not in the body, but in the head. We are culture not flesh. One is born flesh, but becomes culture. Old age weighs itself with intelligence. Be clever and you’ll stay young even when you are 100 years old; be young but an idiot and you are already old!

25 Nov 2021

But I, Francis Sgambelluri, who am I realistically?

By Francis Sgambelluri

who am I realistically?

I have spoken in these days about my autobiography. Now I would like to talk about my life by giving you a self-definition of its concreteness and physical evolution.

To begin with, I am an animal that represents the inanimate and the animated world in miniature.

What does it mean “world” for you ?, someone asks me.

I answer.

World for me means something that is formed by a set of atoms grouped in a small space of the universe that make up the inanimate and the animated phenomena that inhabit it and last as long as they can and then disappear.

From where come from these atoms?

05 Nov 2021

The Universe as it is in 12 images

By Francis Sgambelluri

The Universe as it is in 12 images

Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal “Annalen der Physik” where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world.

The only tolerable immortality is the virtual one and he who knows the universe will conquest it. That’s what I propose in this post to the readers of the Web.

In these 12 images of the universe, starting with homo sapiens sapiens and ending with the immortal virtuality, each of us should be able to understand his own casualty and the meaning of his life in this world of ours. I would like to start by saying that quantum mechanics and general relativity * represent the micro and the macro. In other words, the former belongs to the micro-world, the latter to the macro-world; the first appeared from nothingness of nothingness, the second emerged from the phenomena (i. e. the force of attraction is relative to the magnitude of each phenomenon in question); the first imposes a metaphysical question, the second a physical one; the first has to do with chance, the second with the end: big crunch or big chill; the second without the first wouldn’t exist, the first without nothingness of nothingness either. All this is logical as 2 + 2 = 4, and this helps us nearly to touch with our own hands the origins of the universe, but it doesn’t help us to make sense of our lives, this no or maybe yes? We’ll see.

Let’s start with the first image. Personally, of all the species on this planet, the one that most terrifies and amazes me, is the homo sapiens sapiens.

29 Sep 2021

The existence of the “Universe” and “Life”

By Francis Sgambelluri

The existence of the “Universe” and “Life”

Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal “Annalen der Physik” where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their scientific simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world.

In what follows in this article, I will try to sketch the true basis of the universe and life. Don’t misunderstand me. I’m not a madman and much less one who goes on looking for awards, I am one who is interested to know the heart and soul of the reality that has created us and the world and this is what I will try to illustrate in the seven main definitions on the origin and evolution of the universe.

Let’s start with the first definition. At the beginning there was only “nothingness of nothingness”. At that time only this existed. You can see it as big as the point of a needle or immense as much as you manage to imagine it. There was nothing else, not even the tip of a pin. We call this place of nothingness of nothingness, the primordial basis of the universe.

The second definition. It was from nothingness of nothingness that was created spontaneously “the first particle”. This particle, after billions and billions of years, gave birth to the universe we know today. This is its origin and its birth and also the second basis of the universe. Of course, we could write an entire encyclopedia regarding this start, but we wouldn’t advance of a single comma for what concerns this initial moment.

17 Jul 2021

The World-Universe * in a few clear and meaningful words

By Francis Sgambelluri

The World-Universe * in a few clear and concise words

Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal “Annalen der Physik” where only a few scientists and with many difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on my blog, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their reality, simplicity and meaning, can read and understand them in the whole world.

“And what about the content between Einstein’s articles and yours?”, a reader asked me once.

“It depends on our point of view,” I replied. The same could be said for the post you’re going to read now.

Our world-universe moves in the middle of an infinite space. Before it, there was nothingness of nothingness,

that is to say nothing, total zero, not even a particle. The “nothing” as science understands it, doesn’t exist. For science, “nothing” is full of particles. So if “nothing” is full of particles, it can’t be nothing. In nothingness of nothingness there are not even the particles.

20 Feb 2021

To the lords of the Nobel Committee of Stockholm

By Francis Sgambelluri

To the lords of the Nobel Committee of Stockholm, Uncategorized

Einstein published, in 1905, his famous articles in the scientific journal “Annalen der Physik” where only a few scientists and with difficulties could understand something; I publish my articles on the Web, on Facebook, on Twitter and anyone, given their simplicity and reality, can read and understand them in the whole world.

You might think I’m crazy, but I’m not crazy, crazy is who thinks I’m crazy, not to say an imbecile. Here are some of my Nobel discoveries:

1 “Nothingness of the nothingness” or the basis of the universe, that is, a universe born by chance from nothingness of nothingness. This is the essence and the reality of the universe.

2 “The proto-element” or the beginning or the mother particle of the universe, that is, the particle that contains within itself all the elements to create the universe we know today. This is the birth of the universe.

19 Oct 2020

To die as a Christian is to die against nature *

By Francis Sgambelluri

To die as a Christian is to die against nature

If the Christian religion were true, I would be the first to embrace it. It is not. It is false. It is unnatural and anti-human.

God doesn’t exist, and all believers and non-believers know it.

Christ is fiction, like Don Quixote and Madame Bovary.

The Madonna is a ridiculous invention.

12 Sep 2020

What distinguishes me from Copernicus, Newton, Einstein and Hawking:

By Francis Sgambelluri

Einstein and Hawking:

Things as they are

and not as we want them to be

I have something to say about the universe that Mr Copernicus didn’t have,

I have something to say about the universe that Mr Newton didn’t have,

I have something to say about the universe that Mr Einstein didn’t have,

I have something to say about the universe that Mr Hawking didn’t have:

I know the origins, the roots and the base of the universe that they didn’t know.

What distinguishes me from these 4 brains is also what follows:

29 Jul 2020

Human History in a Nutshell

By Francis Sgambelluri

Human History in a Nutshell

For a new vision of humankind and of the universe

Greetings and welcome to this short, indeed very short, chat about the history of humankind. I will start by saying that today, on a global level, there is an uneasiness in this society of ours which has now gone beyond any limit or any sense of decency.

16 Jul 2020

Scott Fischer and the 10th of May 1996 on the summit of the Everest

By Francis Sgambelluri

Scott Fischer and the 10th of May 1996 on the summit of the Everest

If Scott Fischer became a great man, he didn’t become so because he was an excellent mountaineer, much less because he was the head of the business Mountain Madness, even less because he was an American and let’s not talk about being a good family man; Scott Fischer has become a great man because the society, despite all its pitfalls, has failed to make out of him a social robot. This is the portrait I made of this personage while I was reading “The Climb: Tragic Ambitions on Everest”, Anatoli Boukreev and G. Weston DeWalt, and this is also the most beautiful thing that could happen to a man.

15 Jul 2020

Me and the Universe

By Francis Sgambelluri

a pillar of modern physics made of papier mâché, Me and the Universe

A new vision of the cosmos and life

I need

I don’t know about you

but I need

before I am going to die

to have a vision of everything

and my everything is this:

21 Mar 2020

The universe as it is and not as we want it to be in 10 images (1)

By Francis Sgambelluri

First picture of the universe, The universe as it is and not as we want it to be in 10 images

First picture of the universe

For all those who love,

not lies told by interested parties

from millennia to millennia

but for all those who love truth and reality.

Let’s see, for an instant, all the phenomena that make up the entire universe, not the way we want to see them, but for what they really are: things without names, naked and rudimentary objects in an immense vacuum. This is their reality. Seeing them so, how would they appear to us? They would appear as lifeless matter, blind bodies, bodies big and small, strong and weak, bare and barren, of long and short duration. In short, blind bodies and nothing else.

The universe, when we see it as it is, we realize that it is only a mixture of bodies of all imaginable and unimaginable dimensions, structures, properties, bodies and bodies ourselves. Voilà its reality: a mass of objects, of phenomena, of wonders and nightmares, nothing more, nothing less than a mass of physical elements that roar chaotically in an infinite vacuum, crashing blindly against one another and, in the end, they destroy themselves by losing and disintegrating in the immensity they are in. This is our universe and this is also its ultimate truth and reality.

Someone of you may say: “It’s not true that the universe is only a mass of physical objects and nothing more. It’s enough to take us with our creativity, thoughts, believes, cultures, to demonstrate that what you just said is wrong”.

To this remark I would reply by saying that, if we see this lifeless mass of objects that constitute the whole universe only in the short run, then the remark is correct. Correct, of course, up to a certain point, since all the values we gave to the universe are not its, are ours, we gave them to it. Instead, if we see this mass of objects that constitute the whole universe in the long run, in millions and billions of years, then we realize that we, for this mass of objects constantly in collision with one another, we are for them only momentary dust, pus, itch, disease, rubbish or, if you want, why not, a momentary decoration and nothing else.

In the next post, the second.

1
2
3
4